<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>kino-eye.com</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/" />
<modified>2006-02-06T07:46:21Z</modified>
<tagline>Filmmaking, photography, the internet, books, films, and other topics.</tagline>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.121">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2006, David Tames</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Video Podcasting</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2006/02/video_podcastin.html" />
<modified>2006-02-06T07:46:21Z</modified>
<issued>2006-02-03T07:41:53Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1.93</id>
<created>2006-02-03T07:41:53Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I co-authored an article on video podcasting with Steve Garfield for the February issue of NewEnglandFilm.com. Check it out....</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Podcasting</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[I co-authored <a href="http://www.nefilm.com/news/archives/2006/02/podcasting.htm">an article on video podcasting</a> with <a href="http://www.stevegarfield.com">Steve Garfield</a> for the February issue of NewEnglandFilm.com</a>. Check it out.]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Favela Rising</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2006/02/narrative_docum_1.html" />
<modified>2006-02-06T07:35:53Z</modified>
<issued>2006-02-03T02:47:11Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1.92</id>
<created>2006-02-03T02:47:11Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">On November 15, 2005 the Academy announced the documentary films in competition for 78th Academy Awards and I was pleased to learn that of the 15 films from which the five nominees will be selected, &quot;Favela Rising&quot; was among them....</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Documentary</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>On November 15, 2005 the Academy announced the <a href="http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2005/05.11.15a.html">documentary films in competition for 78th Academy Awards</a> and I was pleased to learn that of the 15 films from which the five nominees will be selected, "<a href="http://www.favelarising.com">Favela Rising</a>"  was among them. While the film did not make the <a href="http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleases/2006/06.01.31.html">final list of Nominations</a>, it remains among the most important films to make the rounds of the festival circuit this year. I first saw the film at the <a href="http://www.roxburyfilmfestival.org">Roxbury Film Festival</a> and was impressed by the film and its potential as an agent of social change, as well as the way it weaved together both documentary and narrative conventions.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of films with the primary goal of entertaining the audience, and then there are others with a loftier goal to motivate social change. Whenever I start to doubt that film and media can have a real effect on communities and can help mobilize people into action, along comes a film that renews my faith in the power of good documentary filmmaking to inspire pople out of their slumber and think. "Favela Rising" is of those films.</p>
<p>
More and more films are getting hard to categorize, are they a narrative or documentary? "Favela Rising" raised this question again, and in very interesting ways. As Mike Nichols suggests in his book "<a href="http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=1037_1336_1406&products_id=20585">Introduction to Documentary</a>," there are two types of films: documentaries of wish fulfillment, commonly referred to as fiction films, and documentaries of social realities, commonly referred to as documentary films. "Favela Rising" is a film that sits in both camps.</p>
<p>
On the one hand the film tells a solid story and shares the aspirations of Anderson Sá, a leader of the <a href="http://www.afroreggae.org.br">AfroReggae</a> cultural movement that exists to counteract the drug violence in a handful of the favlelas in Rio de Janeiro. The film plays a role in creating the myth of Anderson Sá as a leader and co-founder of the movement, without getting into the messy details of too many facts and details. Not that the film should. Anderson Sá's position as a role model is more important that any mission of documentary purity for specific facts of what actually happened when. The truth lies beyond the fact, and myth is a powerful vehicle for social change.</p>
<p>
The film at the same time is a documentary, not a documentary about it's central character, for that story plays out more like a narrative, but the film is a poweful documentary about the social realities that lead to a third of Rio's population being abandoned and ignored by the other two thirds. The citizens who live in the favelas are not afforded the same rights as other Brazilian citizens, for them the law is in the hands of teenage drug gangs and the police are accomplices to the drug lords providing arms, looking the other way, and collecting a handsome sum.</p>
<p>
This reality is clearly depicted in other films like the documentary "<a href="http://www.bus174.com">Bus 174</a>" and the narrative "<a href="http://www.miramax.com/cityofgod">City of God</a>". While "City of God" is clearly in the narrative camp, "Bus 174" is clearly in the documentary camp. "Favela Rising" is different from these two films dealing with similar social realities in that it clearly and unapologetically staddles the line between narative and documentary and is better for it.</p>
<p>
I suspect that this staddling is one of the reasons for not only the films popularity, but it's ability to motivate people. The film has caught the attention of the Ford, Hewlett, and Kellog Foundations as an entertainment vehicle that can be used as a device to inspire other communties with parallel problems to look at how they can solve their problems from inside-out using their internal resources. The film has the potential to go way beyond the festival circuit and small audience  of documentary film lovers and become an agent for social change.</p>
<p>
So, yes, "Favela Rising" is a documentary, and it's a powerful documentary, because it's both types: a documentary of both wish fulfillment and a documentary of social realities. And as a film, it stands as a potentially more powerful agent of change than it could be if it had followed either the conventions of narrative alone or the conventions of documentary alone. Maybe films like this are bringing to the fore a new mode of documentary, the narrative documentary.</p>
<p>
An <a href="http://www.nefilm.com/news/archives/05september/zimbalist.htm">interview I did with Jeff Zimbalist</a>, co-director of the film, appears in the September issue of <a href="http://www.nefilm.com">NewEnglandFilm.com</a>.]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>HVX200 comes to town</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2006/02/hvx200_comes_to.html" />
<modified>2006-02-01T05:02:18Z</modified>
<issued>2006-02-01T05:00:08Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1.91</id>
<created>2006-02-01T05:00:08Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">It was torture playing with the new Panasonic HVX200 at the recent SMPTE/New England show and not being able to take it out on a real shoot...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Camera</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>It was torture playing with the new <a href="http://catalog2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ModelDetail?displayTab=O&storeId=11201&catalogId=13051&itemId=93120&catGroupId=14571&modelNo=AG-HVX200&surfModel=AG-HVX200">Panasonic HVX200</a> at the recent SMPTE/New England show and not being able to take it out on a real shoot... Well, finally, the good folks at <a href="http://www.rule.com">Rule Broadcast</a> tell me the
they finally got one of these puppies.</p><p>I hope to take this camera for a spin very soon. Would especially love to do a side by side comparison of some critical shooting, including doing green screen, comparing the Sony/JVC/Canon HDV cameras vs. Panasonic HVX200 with it's DVCPRO HD. In terms of form factor, this camera will gain lots of favor among people looking for a small, all-in-one camera.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>The key features for me are:</p>
<ul>
<li>High definition recording with low-compression DVCPRO HD codec
</li><li>Small all in one form factor compared to JVC and Canon competitors, it's like a chubby DVX-100 in terms of size and weight
</li><li>16:9/4:3 switchable for SD recording, 16:9 native for HD
</li><li>3 1/3" 16:9 native progressive CCDs with 1080/60p scanning
</li><li>CineGamma derived from the Varicam and helps emulate the latitude of film. 
</li><li>PCM 48K 16-bit audio
</li><li>2 XLR inputs
</li><li>13X Wide angle (32.5-423 35mm equiv) Leica Dicomar Zoom
</li><li>optical image stabilizer
</li><li>auto/manual focus with focus assist, cam-driven zoom
</li><li>Records in several formats, SD: 480/60i, 480/24p, 480pA, 480/30p, and HD: 1080/60i, 1080/24p, 1080/24A, 1080/30p, 720p (variable frame rates)
</li><li>Variable frame rate recording: in 720p mode can record: 12, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 30, 32, 36, 48, and 60 fps, now that's delightful!
</li><li>records HD in either 1080i or 720p onto Panasonic P2 cards 
</li><li>also records in DV, DVCPro, and DVCPro 50 formats as well.
</li><li>capable of downconverting HD material stored on P2 cards to
     MiniDV tapes in the internal tape drive
</li><li>P2 storage cards are available in 4 and 8 GB sizes
</li><li>8 GB P2 card stores 20 minutes of footage shot at 24p.
</li><li>Focus Enhancements will have a Firestore HD drive that this can record to in all but the native 720p format 
</ul>
<p>Looks like this is the ultimate progressive scan HD camera for the money. Some amazing looking films are going to be shot with this. I've not been this excited about a video camera since the introduction of the Varicam, at the time I said, "can't wait to see the technology trickle down to the prosumer camcorder form-factor and price range." We'll, many years later, it's here! But I do need to shoot with it before I allow myself to get too excited.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The web expands social networks</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2006/01/the_web_expands.html" />
<modified>2006-01-31T12:58:27Z</modified>
<issued>2006-01-31T12:53:35Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1.90</id>
<created>2006-01-31T12:53:35Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A new Pew Internet and American Life Project Report done jointly with University of Toronto sociologists shows that the internet helps cultivate social networks and encourages people to talk by phone or meet others in person and put them into...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[A new <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/172/report_display.asp">Pew Internet and American Life Project Report</a> done jointly with University of Toronto sociologists shows that the internet helps cultivate social networks and encourages people to talk by phone or meet others in person and put them into action at times when they neded help on important matters in their lives.]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Secret recipe for amazing image quality video downloads</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2006/01/secret_recipe_f.html" />
<modified>2006-01-27T18:14:55Z</modified>
<issued>2006-01-27T13:32:53Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1.88</id>
<created>2006-01-27T13:32:53Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">My &quot;secret recipe&quot; for amazing image quality with video downloads via the web is not so secret, I&apos;ve been using the H.264 (a.k.a. MPEG-4 Part 10) codec along with AAC for the audio. H.264 is much more efficient than previous...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Video on the Web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[My "secret recipe" for amazing image quality with video downloads via the web is not so secret, I've been using the <a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/">H.264</a> (a.k.a. MPEG-4 Part 10) codec along with <a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/aac/">AAC</a> for the audio. <a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/">H.264</a> is much more efficient than previous MPEG codecs (compared to MPEG-2, H.263, or MPEG-4 Part 2) and thus requires half of the bandwidth for the same image quality as the previous codecs. By the way, <a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/">H.264</a> is the codec used in the HD-DVD standard, as well as Blu-ray Disc, and many broadcast applications, it's the wave of the future and it's here today.]]>
<![CDATA[<p>
In terms of compression tools, I suggest using QuickTime Pro to
convert your HD or DV video masters to compressed form.
Sorenson also offers an implementation of H.264, the 
Sorenson AVC Pro codec is now available in 
<a href="http://www.sorensonmedia.com/solutions/prod/comp_win.php">Sorenson Squeeze</a> and
I would imagine 
<a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=5708192">Media Cleaner</a>
now offer it too, but I've not used cleaner in a long time, as QuickTime export has been
working out well for me. If your using Avid and not Final Cut, I imagine you can
export from Avid using "QuickTime conversion" just like you can from Final Cut, but I don't
have a Avid handy to check this out as I write this.
</p><p>
The <a href="http://www.cdiabu.com/podcast/video">video podcasts</a>
I've been doing with students at <a href="http://www.cdiabu.com">CDIA</a>
are compressed from Final Cut Pro using the "Export => QuickTime Conversion"
menu and then selecting the desired options (described
below).
</p><p>
The only downside is that older systems can't play the
movies, they require <a
href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html">QuickTime 7</a> for Windows (running 2000 or XP) or
Macintosh (running Panther or Tiger), there are other
options for playing back H.264, however, <a
href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html">QuickTime 7</a> is by far the easiest in install and
use, and it's a free download from Apple. <a
href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/pro/mac.html">QuickTime 7 Pro</a> offers additional features for $29.95. This will
be required for it's authoring features that include
creating video for iPod, simple cuts-only editing with cut,
copy and paste simplicity, and convert (or export) media
formats as described in this post.
</p><p>
From Final Cut Pro I've been making movies for download (and
playback using QuickTime 7 player or Browser Plug-In with
QuickTime's wonderful "Fast Start" capability that offers
download quality and streaming performance (with a fast
Internet connection) that beats hands down other download or
streaming video options in terms of overall quality and
experience.
</p><p>
Export Option: Movie to QuickTime Movie
<br/>
Compression Tool: Export using QuickTime 7 Conversion via
Final Cut Pro
</p><p>
<strong>VIDEO SETTINGS</strong>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Size: Use Custom Size: Width: 320, Height: 240</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Compression Type: H.264</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Frame Rate: 15fps</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Motion: Key Frames: Automatic</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Motion: Frame Reordering is checked</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Conpressor: Quality: Best</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Compressor: Encoding: Best Quality (Multi-Pass)</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Data Rate: Data Rate: Restrict to 300 kbit/sec</li>
<li>Movie Settings: Prepare for Internet Streaming (checked on): Fast Start (select this
option from the pop-up)</li>
</ul>
<p>
<strong>AUDIO SETTINGS</strong>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Sound Settings: Format: AAC</li>
<li>Sound Settings: Channels: Stereo (L R) (and you can
save a little bit rate if you go for Mono).</li>
<li>Sound Settings: Sampling Rate: 32.000</li>
<li>Sound Settings: Sample Rate Converter Settings: Quality: Best</li>
<li>Sound Settings: AAC Encoder Settings: Target Bit Rate: 64 kbps (or 96 kbs
for better stereo audio, do some tests and find what's acceptable to you)</li>
</ul>
</p><p>
<strong>NOTES</strong>
<p>For viewing on computer screens when there's not a
lot of motion, you save big time bringing the data rate down
to 15fps.</p>
<p>QuickTime's Fast Start feature allows the QuickTime player
(or Browser Plug-In) to start playing the movie before the
download completes. If movies stutter or stop on playback
via the web, see the support page 
"<a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.4/en/mh2019.html">
Getting the best playback with Internet movies</a>" 
on the Apple web site.</p>
<p>This combination of video and audio settings will end up limiting the the total data
rate to 364 to 396 kbit/sec which yields acceptable 1/4
screen playback (320 x 240) and reasonable download times with home DSL
and Cable Model connections. If you have a lot of complex
music and your audio track is stereo, you might want to bump
the AAC Encoder Target Bit Rate up to 128 kbps.</p>
<p>One price you pay for the the improved image quality of this
recipe is that given the H.264 codec and choosing the best
quality multi-pass compression, it will take a long time for
your movies to compress, but the wait is worth it, like a
fine Cabernet.</p>
<p>One issue is that this movie will be small and download
quickly, however, for use with an iPod via iTunes there is
one small problem, the movie will require conversion in
iTunes before it can be dragged directly to a video iPod.</p>
<p>You can create movies that can be dragged directly to a
video iPod without conversion if you choose the Export:
"Movie to iPod (320 x 240)" setting instead of the Export:
"Movie to QuickTime Movie" setting, however, it creates
movies that are about 30% larger than the settings I like to
use.</p>
<p>For a SEAMLESS direct download and iTunes/iPod experience,
you might consider offering two options, but then it starts
to get messy. I've not found a set of settings yet that
yield the BEST OF BOTH worlds, drag to iPod without
conversion and smaller file size for better playback via
download. This is an ongoing investigation.
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Wide Screen QuickTime Movies from Squeezed Material</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2006/01/wide_screen_qui.html" />
<modified>2006-02-06T08:06:44Z</modified>
<issued>2006-01-08T06:12:20Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2006://1.89</id>
<created>2006-01-08T06:12:20Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Here&apos;s a tip for delivering QuickTime movies using QuickTime 7 Pro Player that will open up and play straight away as 16:9 from material that was originally exported as a 16:9 image squeezed into a 4:3 video frame....</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>QuickTime</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Here's a tip for delivering QuickTime movies using QuickTime 7 Pro Player that will open up and play straight away as 16:9 from material
that was originally exported as a 16:9 image squeezed into a 4:3 video frame.
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>To have squeezed QuickTime movies play in the correct 16:9 aspect ratio, you want to change the horizontal size to 1.78 times the height of the movie, for example, for a 320 x 240 movie, you want to change the horizontal dimension to 240 x 1.78 = 428 (rounding up to the next even number), here's how to do it:</p>
<img src="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/QuickTimeAspectRatio.jpg" alt="[Screen Shot]" width="400" height="320" border="0" vspace="3" hspace="3" style="float: right">
<ol>
<li>Open the movie in QuickTime Player</li>
<li>Select the "Show Movie Properties" Menu</li>
<li>A Dialog Box comes up, click on "Video Track"</li>
<li>Uncheck the check box that says "Preserve Aspect Ratio,"</li>
<li>Enter the new width in place of the old width (428 in the case of a 320 x 240 movie) in the text entry field labeled "Scaled Size", then press return and you'll see the movie change it's aspect ratio.
<li>Save the movie, now it will open up and play as a 16:9 movie rather than 4:3 with a squeezed image.</li>
</ol>
<p>
That's it, this does require the player to scale in real time which might have a slight performance impact on slower machines. If things don't play as expected on a video iPod, there's a preference somewhere   along the lines of "Play Widescreen" that needs to be set right.
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Headphones</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/12/headphones.html" />
<modified>2005-12-29T21:00:10Z</modified>
<issued>2005-12-29T20:38:09Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.87</id>
<created>2005-12-29T20:38:09Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">One of the best values for the money in terms of audio performance, ergonomics, and useful life are the Sony MDR-7506 Studio Monitor Headphones available from various retailers including Rule and Talamas in the Boston area for a street price...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Sound</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[One of the best values for the money in terms of audio performance, ergonomics, and useful life are the <a href="http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/DisplayModel?id=52568">Sony MDR-7506 Studio Monitor Headphones</a> available from various retailers including <a href="http://www.rule.com">Rule</a> and <a href="http://www.talamas.com">Talamas</a> in the Boston area for a street price around $100.00 or so. <img alt="MDR-7506 Headphones" src="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/MDR7506.jpg" width="153" height="215" style="float: right"/>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>You can find many headphones that cost more, but not many that sound as accurate. They fold up and come with a coiled cord and a storage pouch. The connector on the cable is a 1/8" mini and comes with a 1/4" adapter that screws onto the 1/8" mini plug so it's ready to plug into a wide range of devices. My only gripe is that the storage pouch does not include a pocket to store the adapter, which is easily lost. I've fashioned one with gaffer tape on the inside of the pouch, since I  switch between different types of devices.</p>
<p>Because these headphones are designed for professional use, replacement parts are available, as the MDR-7506 is a standard among broadcast professionals and rental houses who need to be able to order spare parts to keep their equipment in tip top shape, so unlike many other headphones in the $100. category, these are actually designed to be repaired in the field, all the parts are available in case you need to replace something like the soft ear pads,  that eventually get damaged with constant use, true for any brand.</p>
<p>I own a pair and a while back ordered a whole bunch for them for use at school, and over the years this has been the model I have specified when I've rented audio equipment for video and film production, it's been around for a while, and remains popular.</p>
<p>Now the fact that they are accurate and flat in terms of frequency response is good and bad. They don't color the sound, so if you're looking for artificial boost or warmth in your music, these headphones will not provide it. On the other hand, with good audio sources they are a joy to listen to in terms of their accuracy.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Record number of patents and trademark registrations in 2005</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/12/record_number_o.html" />
<modified>2005-12-04T08:00:57Z</modified>
<issued>2005-12-04T07:53:25Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.85</id>
<created>2005-12-04T07:53:25Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">According to the United States Patent and Tradmark Office (USPTO) 2005 Performance and Accountability Report, the USPTO received a record number of patent and trademark applications. The agency received 406,302 patent applications, and 323,501 applications for trademark registrations. California resident...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[According to the United States Patent and Tradmark Office (USPTO) <a href="http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2005/index.html">2005 Performance and Accountability Report</a>, the USPTO received a record number of patent and trademark applications. The agency received 406,302 patent applications, and 323,501 applications for trademark registrations. California resident inventors received the highest share (23 percent, 19,928 patents) of these patents, followed by inventors from New York (7 percent, 5,631 patents), Texas (7 percent, 5,660 patents), Michigan (5 percent, 3,907 patents), and Massachusetts (4 percent, 3,443 patents). ]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Oblique Strategies</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/12/oblique_strateg.html" />
<modified>2005-12-04T09:01:11Z</modified>
<issued>2005-12-03T08:47:08Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.86</id>
<created>2005-12-03T08:47:08Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">One of my favorite Dashboard Widgets is Oblique Strategies, a digital version of the Oblique Strategies card decks created by Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt. The decks provides aphorisms to help with writer’s block, creative blank, or when decisions need...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Art</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[One of my favorite Dashboard Widgets is <a href="http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/reference/oblique.html">Oblique Strategies</a>, a digital version of the <a href="http://www.rtqe.net/ObliqueStrategies/">Oblique Strategies card decks</a> created by Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt. The decks provides aphorisms to help with writer’s block, creative blank, or when decisions need non-rational input. ]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Invasion of the pod people</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/12/invasion_of_the.html" />
<modified>2005-12-02T15:55:39Z</modified>
<issued>2005-12-02T15:52:01Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.84</id>
<created>2005-12-02T15:52:01Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">This month in NewEnglandFilm.com I write about podcasting and provide a guided tour of some interesting video and audio podcasts out there including some local New England podcasts....</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Podcasting</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[This month in NewEnglandFilm.com I <a href="http://www.nefilm.com/news/archives/05december/podcasting.htm">write about podcasting</a> and provide a guided tour of some interesting video and audio podcasts out there including some local New England podcasts.]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Copyright fair use for documentary filmmakers</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/12/copyright_fair.html" />
<modified>2005-12-02T15:56:23Z</modified>
<issued>2005-12-01T05:45:46Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.83</id>
<created>2005-12-01T05:45:46Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In the article Doc-makers get specific about copyright fair use Steve Behrens writes that things have changed for documentary producers who need to use somebody else’s footage or music in their films. He reports that on Nov. 18th the Association...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Documentary</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[In the article <a href="http://www.current.org/doc/doc0521fairuse.shtml">Doc-makers get specific about copyright fair use</a> Steve Behrens writes that things have changed for documentary producers who need to use somebody else’s footage or music in their films. He reports that on Nov. 18th the Association of Independent Video and Filmmakers, the Independent Documentary Association, public TV’s Independent Television Service and the series P.O.V., and other media groups endorsed a Statement of Best Practices defining four kinds of situations when a producer, under the “fair use” provisions of copyright law, need not pay for a film clip, a shot of a painting or a snatch of music. Good article.]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sell a Movie (or Fail) in Four Hours</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/11/sell_a_movie_or.html" />
<modified>2005-11-15T13:43:53Z</modified>
<issued>2005-11-13T15:35:01Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.81</id>
<created>2005-11-13T15:35:01Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In today&apos;s New York Times, I read &quot; How to Sell a Movie (or Fail) in Four Hours&quot; an article by Adam Leipzig, president of National Geographic Feature Films, providing an amusing and succinct description of the challenges studio executives...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Films</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[In today's <i>New York Times,</i> I read "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/13/movies/13leip.html"> How to Sell a Movie (or Fail) in Four Hours</a>" an article by Adam Leipzig, president of National Geographic Feature Films, providing an amusing and succinct description of the challenges studio executives face today bringing movies to market, he states, "If you think life is moving too fast - hyped up with BlackBerries, blogs, podcasts and instant messages - imagine what it is like to run a movie studio these days." The macro changes in the distribution landscape might be a headache for studio executives, but I think it spells boundless opportunities for filmmakers who see the marketing of their films as an entrepreneurial process taking advantage of all that the internet has to offer.]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Theaters Left Behind</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/11/theaters_left_b_1.html" />
<modified>2005-11-15T14:06:04Z</modified>
<issued>2005-11-13T14:51:23Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.82</id>
<created>2005-11-13T14:51:23Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Theater attendance is down. The cost of digital projection is down. DVD sales drive the profits in the motion picture industry while pirates provide a flow of cheap content via alternative channels, it&apos;s no wonder that distribution is getting turned...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Films</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
Theater attendance is down. The cost of digital
projection is down. DVD sales drive the profits
in the motion picture industry while pirates provide
a flow of cheap content via alternative channels,
it&apos;s no wonder that distribution is getting turned
on it&apos;s head and will eventually slip out of the
hands of the studios and big theater chains.
<![CDATA[ Consider
this data point: on Jan. 27, the Steven Soderbergh's film
"Bubble" will be released at the same time in theaters,
on cable television and DVD. Get it to the audience
before the pirates do. Seems like a more effective
strategy than trying to stop the pirates, which is
equivalent to getting rid of all of the cockaroaches
in New York city. It's simply impossible to get rid
of them and do no hard to the other living things. So
distribution adapts. I'm thinking about this because
I just read Rob Walker's "Consumed" 
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/13/magazine/13wwln_consumed">column about <i>Left Behind: World at War,</i></a>
in Sunday's <i>New York Times Magazine</i>.
This is the third movie adaptation of the apocalyptic
novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins that opened
in October on 3,200 screens, but not in theaters,
instead, the film opened mostly in churches. Much in the
same way <a href="http://www.MoveOn.org">MoveOn.org</a>
arranged <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/07/19/MNGFV7NRTF1.DTL">house parties</a> for <a href="http://www.outfoxed.org/">OutFoxed</a>,
Cloud Ten Pictures, the producer of the series, has tapped
into a network churches that will probably become a
an alternative theater system. So maybe if you count
things like this, theatrical attendance is not really
down, it's just that the concept of theatrical exhibition
is changing.]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Northampton Film Festival - Three Picks</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/11/northampton_fil.html" />
<modified>2005-11-11T13:38:27Z</modified>
<issued>2005-11-10T11:32:07Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.80</id>
<created>2005-11-10T11:32:07Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The Northampton Independent Film Festival takes place in Northampton, Massachusetts this weekend and is offering a great program, here are three picks among the many great films being screened: On Saturday the 13th at 3:30pm &quot;In the Land of Milk...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Films</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.niff.org">Northampton Independent Film Festival</a> takes place in Northampton, Massachusetts this weekend and is offering a great program, here are three picks among the many great films being screened: On Saturday the 13th at 3:30pm "<a href="http://www.inthelandofmilkandmoney.com">In the Land of Milk and Money</a>" (2004, Susan Emshwiller) screens in Stoddard Hall at Smith College, Lower Elm Street. On Friday the 11th at 7:00pm and Sunday the 13th at 7:50pm "<a href="http://www.favelarising.com">Favela Rising</a>" (2005, Jeff Zimbalist and Matt Mochary)screens their new 35mm print w/ co-director Jeff Zimbalist in attendance at the Academy of Music Theater, 274 Main Street. On Sunday the 13th at 5:00pm "<a href="http://angeldevilproductions.com/mia/index.htm">Missing in America</a>" (2005, Gabrielle Savage Dockterman) screens at the Academy of Music Theater, 274 Main Street. The festival information number is: 413-582-1832, check the <a href="http://www.niff.org">festival web site</a> to confirm screening times and venues, have fun!]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Teenage content creators</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.kino-eye.com/archives/2005/11/teenage_content.html" />
<modified>2005-11-08T13:46:52Z</modified>
<issued>2005-11-08T11:24:13Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.kino-eye.com,2005://1.79</id>
<created>2005-11-08T11:24:13Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A recently published report from the Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project dated November 2, 2005 found that American teens are utilizing the interactive capabilities of the internet as they create and share their own media creations. Fully half of...</summary>
<author>
<name>David Tames</name>

<email>david@kino-eye.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Media Literacy</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kino-eye.com/">
<![CDATA[A recently published <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/166/report_display.asp">report</a> from the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org">Pew Internet & American Life Project</a> dated November 2, 2005 found that American teens are  utilizing the interactive capabilities of the internet as they  create and share their own media creations. Fully half of all teens and 57% of teens who use the internet could be considered content creators.]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>